By Ian S. Markham
During this new e-book, Ian Markham analyzes the atheistic global view, opposing the arguments given by way of popular authors of books on atheism, equivalent to Richard Dawkins. in contrast to different responses to the hot atheism, Markham demanding situations those authors all alone floor by way of wondering their figuring out of trust and of atheism itself. the result's a remodeling creation to Christianity that might entice someone drawn to this debate.
• a desirable problem to the new spate of profitable books written through high-profile atheist authors equivalent to Richard Dawkins, Christopher Hitchens, and Sam Harris
• Tackles those authors all alone floor, arguing that they don't comprehend the character of atheism, not to mention theology and ethics
• attracts on rules from Nietzsche, cosmology, and artwork to build a strong reaction that permits for a religion that's grounded, but person who acknowledges the truth of uncertainty
• Succinct, attractive, yet robustly argued, this new ebook through a number one educational and author encompasses a wealth of profound insights that express non secular trust in a brand new mild
Read Online or Download Against atheism: why Dawkins, Hitchens, and Harris are fundamentally wrong PDF
Best theology books
Considering the fact that its e-book within the mid-eighteenth century, Hume's dialogue of miracles has been the objective of serious and sometimes ill-tempered assaults. during this publication, considered one of our prime historians of philosophy bargains a scientific reaction to those attacks.
Arguing that those criticisms have--from the very start--rested on misreadings, Robert Fogelin starts by means of supplying a story of how Hume's argument really unfolds. What Hume's critics (and even a few of his defenders) have didn't see is that Hume's basic argument will depend on solving the fitting criteria of comparing testimony provided on behalf of a miracle. Given the definition of a miracle, Hume particularly quite argues that the criteria for comparing such testimony has to be super excessive. Hume then argues that, on the contrary, no testimony on behalf of a spiritual miracle has even come with regards to assembly the suitable criteria for recognition. Fogelin illustrates that Hume's critics have continuously misunderstood the constitution of this argument--and have saddled Hume with completely lousy arguments now not present in the textual content. He responds first to a few early critics of Hume's argument after which to 2 fresh critics, David Johnson and John Earman. Fogelin's target, despite the fact that, isn't to "bash the bashers," yet particularly to teach that Hume's therapy of miracles has a coherence, intensity, and gear that makes it nonetheless the simplest paintings at the topic.
Will humans of different faiths be 'saved' and to what volume should still the reaction to this question form Christian engagements with humans of different faiths? traditionally, the major solution to those questions has been that the individual of one other religion are not kept and is hence wanting conversion to Christianity for his or her salvation to be attainable.
What are people to do―and how may still caregivers respond―when confronted with the truth of discomfort? The Roots of Sorrow addresses the occasionally painful questions that encompass human soreness. via integrating concrete examples with own tales of adversity and sorrow, Phil Zylla constructs a pastoral theology that situates itself in the very middle of pain.
This e-book presents a complete theological framework for assessing eating's importance, utilising a Trinitarian theological lens to guage nutrition creation and intake practices as they're being labored out in brand new commercial nutrition platforms. Norman Wirzba combines the instruments of ecological, agrarian, cultural, biblical, and theological analyses to attract an image of consuming that cares for creatures and that honors God.
Extra info for Against atheism: why Dawkins, Hitchens, and Harris are fundamentally wrong
The study of literature and poetry, both for its own sake for the eternal ethical questions with which it deals, can now easily depose the scrutiny of sacred texts that have been found to corrupt and confected. The pursuit of unfettered scientific inquiry, and the availability of new findings to masses of people by easy electronic means, will revolutionize our concepts of research and development. Very importantly, the divorce between the sexual life and fear, and the sexual life and disease, and the sexual life and tyranny, can now at last be attempted, on the sole condition that we banish all religions from the discourse.
It is such a long, drawn-out process; it is also very cruel. Hitchens writes: We must also confront the fact that evolution is, as well as smarter than we are, infinitely more callous and cruel, and also capricious. 27 For Hitchens, God made some sense in a pre-scientific age and culture. But now, our understanding of the world has evolved. The God hypothesis has been made redundant. We need to move on. For this stage of the summary of the arguments found in these three books, my view is that Hitchens’s more traditional argument for atheism is stronger than Dawkins’s more innovative argument for atheism.
It is odd, ponders Fred, that for centuries the world worried that without religion there would be a breakdown in ethics. In fact, all the major advances in ethics have come since the Western Enlightenment. Toleration, for example, is not really found until John Locke has the bright idea that a Baptist and an Anglican could coexist within the same country. Or feminism (he was proud of his mother’s achievements as a CEO of a major company), which was hardly encouraged by the Church. Or his gay friend, who came so close to suicide due to his religious upbringing, and who needed secular science to reassure him that he is not committing a sin because of who he is.